On Jan 22, 2008 9:09 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
> jSieve: do we just need to package a release, review and vote on it (I > don't see open JIRA issues for 0.2)? I think we already discussed the > possibility to release it on 24/10/2007 and everyone agreed we were > ready. I can't sign releases, but I can support with any other related > task (review, run tests, update JIRA and website for the release, add > the news, etc). it's ready to release given someone stepping up to act as release manager > > mime4j - completion of refactoring > > I'm not sure how much energy this will take and how we should delay a > release, but why don't we release 0.4 based on the current codebase and > then refactor more in 0.5 ? > We did this with jSPF and we made a lot of releases. I think it is > better to have many incompatible releases than no releases ;-) > Having a release means that users will download and test it, and will > report bugs against a specific codebase. > I think we solved most of legal issues related to the release of mime4j. IIRC mime4j is only required for mailbox etc - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
