+1 jcr has some drawbacks (afaik there's still a jackrabbit hard limit of a few thousand docs per node which is too few for a big mail deployment) but IMHO is well worth having in trunk to allow people to experiment. Its an area that has a lot of current interest (with the resurgence of CRM, and all the channel blending that implies, as an IT Big Thing) and IMHO it would be a Good Thing to make it more readily accessable. Whats more I think Jukka did a great job which deserves more visibility.
d On Feb 2, 2008 3:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > i'd like to copy james-jcr into trunk and add some example > > configurations. development can continue in the sandbox (or not) and > > merged in later (if necessary). > > > > any objections? > > > > - robert > > +1 > And I would prefer if development will continue in trunk. If it does not > require big changes to other modules then we don't need a sandbox or a > branch. If instead further development will require experimental changes > to core api then a sandbox or a branch will be more appropriate. > > Stefano > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
