On Feb 5, 2008 1:41 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Danny Angus ha scritto: > > I agree with noel, processors should be the deployable application > > I'm not sure I understand yours and Noel idea. Noel's message seems to > say that I proposed to redeploy single mailets, instead I proposed to > redeploy the spoolmanager. > > Being able to undeploy and redeploy the spoolmanager then you can alter > the configuration of each mailet and each processor. > > In the current architecture if you don't unload the spoolmanager you > can't undeploy the mailet/matcher loader and this mean you cannot > upgrade your mailets or add new mailets. Processors and Mailets are not > components in our COP, SpoolManager is instead a component.
stefano is right that given our current COP, SpoolManager would have to be redeployed noel and danny are right that for reployment to work elegantly, the level of granularity should be the processor IMHO this area would be high pay for a relatively small amount of work. perhaps we could focus on this at the hackathon. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
