Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 09:40 +0100 schrieb Norman Maurer: > Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2008, 23:04 +0000 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin: > > On Feb 13, 2008 12:14 PM, Pietro Romanazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > hi > > > > > just added an attachment to JAMES-290 containing a new version of the > > > previous experiment. I left the old file in place. > > > The STARTTLS support is now configurable. > > > I submit this code for discussion. > > > Is the James developer community interested in this new feature? > > > > we're always interested in new code :-) > > > > but we'll need to wait until one of the SMTP experts finds some time > > to comment before we can start reviewing the contribution in detail... > > > > - robert > > I don't know if im an expert of SMTP ;-P but I will have a look at this > later today. > > bye > Norman
>From a quick review it seems to be ok. But the main problem seems to that it is based on 2.3.x code base. We don't include new features in 2.3.x releases. So the question is what todo .. 1. Refactor it to fit the smtp architecture in trunk ( will this be really the code to go in next release or should we better use the 2.3.x code ? ) .... 2. Put it in queue for a 2.4.x release ( Noel ? ) .. Any ideas ? Cheers, Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
