On 2/16/08, Steve Brewin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ahmed Mohombe wrote on 16 February 2008 19:07: > > > Hi, > > > > It looks like the test framework for JAMES (at least for IMAP), > > is pretty independent of JAMES (or at least a part of it), > > and could be even used to test other servers as well. > > > > Would it make sense to extract it as a JAMES subproject? > > (I mean the independent/generic part)? > > > > For mail loading tests, there's already another subproject - > > Postage (also supposed > > to work with other servers as well), so a "protocol/unit > > testing" would be a nice > > companion :) (and could convince users from other projects to > > use it as well :) ).
is this the new or the old stuff? > > What do you think? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Ahmed. > > This sounds like an excellent idea if you have the urge to pursue it. As you > say, it "would be a nice". > > +1 IMAP allows servers a lot of latitude in what they return. this tends to make interoperability testing difficult. work would be needed to improve the framework and the scripts before they could be used for true interoperability testing. not sure that this is an itch for me but i would have no objections if someone wanted to volunteer to take this on. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
