On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert, > > It sounds OK, so +1 in general, but with all of the refactoring, we've > making it increasingly difficult to compare versions of JAMES. This would > not be so bad if we had ever made a stable baseline prior to the > refactorings, but instead we started with unstable baselines and refactored, > meaning that we will have to do considerable manual comparison between the > only known stable JAMES code (2.3.0) with its known defects and the current > trunk(s) for JAMES and Mailets.
trunk was forked from 2.3.0 several years ago now and contains significant differences not only in organisation but also design. i doubt whether anyone has the time required to perform a comprehensive manual comparison now whether the mailets are in trunk or elsewhere. i think that moving the mailets into a separate project should make things move managable. the mailets moved can be compared with 2.3.x and (once this has been done) a single consolidated library can used for both 2.x and 3.x releases (as well as trunk). - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
