Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some handler might require checks on the remote hostname. Mailets have
access to the remote hostname, too. I guess lazy "resolving" is not an
option because it will happen almost always (I've not checked the code, but
this is my feeling about this).
yes, some handlers may need this information but at least one (IMAP)
does not. if the IP is stored, why isn't lazy resolution an option on
a per protocol basis?
- robert
If it works for IMAP then +1.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
