+1 On the question to move in the direction of a mailet-building toolkit, I think that is a good idea.
--Søren -- Søren Hilmer, M.Sc., M.Crypt. wideTrail Phone: +45 25481225 Pilevænget 41 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DK-8961 Allingåbro Web: www.widetrail.dk On Thu, April 24, 2008 20:00, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > JAMES 2.3.x contains mailet and mailet-api jars. the contents are now > in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/. this means > that clearly API classes such as Mailet are mixed in with clearly > utility classes such as GenericMailet. it would be good to release > 2.3.x improvements to these classes but IMO this needs to be sorted > out first. > > we've talk before about whether a library for utility classes (in > addition to standard-mailets) would be useful. i would like to propose > introducing mailet-base to contain utility classes for the mailet-api. > this would leave standard-mailets free for implementations and > mailet-api free to contain just the API. i propose to judge each > classes in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/ by > it's merits so i don't want to propose contents at this stage just > principle. > > here's my +1 > > - robert > > --8<------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [ ] +1 Create mailet-base > [ ] +0 > [ ] -0 > [ ] -1 Do not create mailet-base > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
