Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
IIRC there's some reason why the spool manager can't be replaced by
JMS. anyone know what it is?
- robert
ATM the SpoolRepository interface need "lock" and "unlock" concepts,
"accept" concept, being able to set the ID of the message to be sent (as
opposite of receiving an identifier for the sent message), so using JMS
will make it a bit complicate.
It would be much more easy to change the SpoolRepository interface first
and then implement it with JMS.
BTW, if you can think to a good implementation of SpoolRepository based
on JMS then here is my +1
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
