Am Sonntag, den 15.06.2008, 14:27 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > >> > >> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > >>>> > >>>> Enable OSGi in Ant build > >>>> > >>>> Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/build.xml > >>>> URL: > >>>> > >>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jsieve/trunk/build.xml?rev=667819&r1=667818&r2=667819&view=diff > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ============================================================================== > >>>> + definitions="manve-bundle.bnd"/> > >>> > >>> What is this "definitions" ? > >>> is "manve" a typo for "maven" or what? > >>> > >>> I see a maven-build.bnd in the source tree: should this be a pointer to > >>> that > >>> file? > >> > >> think so but it seemed to work ok so maybe i don't understand the bnd > >> ant tasks correctly (which is very possible). please feel free to jump > >> in and patch. > > > > I don't understand it very much too :-/ > > > > Looking at docs it seems definitions should be a folder, so I changed it to > > ".": maybe it looks for *.bnd in that folder and it silently fallback to "." > > when the given "definitions" folder cannot be found. > > > > But I also tried to remove the maven-build.bnd file from the file system and > > the generated jar (and MANIFEST) is identical. I'm a bit lost on this... > > > > Maybe we can remove that bnd file from our source tree? > > if it does no good, go ahead. probably needs more fiddling to get it right. > > the maven build gives a better manifest anyway. norman's volunteered > to cut jsieve so if he's happy to use maven, i'm not so worried about > a perfect ant build ATM. > > - robert
You know I prefer maven over ant.. So yes I'm happy ;-) bye Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
