On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good > > Why?
specifically: restarting my JAMES instance every couple of days has started to irritate generally: we've talked before and the whole design around that area of the system could be so much better technology: actually support for any distributable messaging solution but i can see no reason not to use a standard > You do realize that rewriting the spool for JMS actually means introducing a > spool broker service, right? i think so but please elaborate - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
