Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Rick McGuire ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
IIRC few months ago: the issue was with the smtpclient (to deliver
mail) and the "hidden" features (e.g: 8BITMIME) and specific
exceptions (on delivery failure for partial deliveries). We make use
of many internal things and we check for sun specific exceptions
because the specification itself is thought with MUA (mail clients)
in mind and not MDA (servers).
I believe I finally got the 8BIT MIME support figured out and
implemented. The Geronimo SMTPTransport implementation should
implement most, if not all, of Sun extension properties. I'm
certainly willing to consider adding any that you find missing.
Hi Rick,
you are *fast* :-)
It wasn't that big of a change, once I finally figured out what I was
supposed to implement. The spec source is here:
can you make a build of the latest geronimo javamail implementation
(and tell me where I can see the sources, too)? If so I can try to at
least run our unit tests with geronimo javamail instead of sun
javamail. We don't have many tests, but at least 8bitmite have few
tests because until 1.4.1 the sun implementation was very buggy and we
never enabled 8bitmime support because of failing tests.
The binary can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/javamail/
The source is split into two pieces, a spec component (essentially the
javax.mail.* classes) and the providers. Part of the providers build
creates a merged jar file containing both the spec and the providers.
The specs can be found here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec
The providers code is in this subproject:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/trunk/geronimo-javamail_1.4
You'll need to build specs first, then run an mvn build from the root of
the second tree, which will build both the providers and the uber jar.
One thing I've been very frustrated with in the javamail client code has
been the difficulty in setting up automated unit tests because of the
dependency on another target server. It would be really great if we
could get the James test suite running with the Geronimo API and give it
a real shakeout. One of the problems I had run into with developing the
different providers originally was James didn't support all of the
authentication mechanisms I needed to test out for all of the server
types. It's been a while since I looked....has additional support been
added?
Rick
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
