On 6/20/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:27 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> <total snip> >>> >>> So I seem to have provoked much more discussion than I intended here. >> >> don't worry - seems to happen a lot here :-) > > sorry, but discussion is good as long as we have objective and produce > something as part of the discussion. > >> [...] >>> I've lost track of the ensuing discussion. Points (1) and (2) are my >>> interpretation of what I thought was consensus reached on the >>> legal-discuss >>> list around dec-2007-jan-2008 leading up to release of the latest maven >>> remote resource bundle for apache. Getting it documented clearly would >>> have >>> been a good idea at the time but I was tired. >> >> documentation is tough: i would describe this stuff as strongly >> recommended best practice rather than mandatory policy ATM > > Make sense. You're on Legal Affairs, you should really say this as a > comment there: > LEGAL-26 LICENSE and NOTICE in svn > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26 > LEGAL-27 LICENSE/NOTICE content vs package content > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-27 > > or comment the JIRA notifications on legal-discuss > > :-)
I not wearing that hat right now. In any case I generally try to avoid commenting on issues I'm directly involved with. Robert > > Stefano > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
