On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to know if, after almost 2 years we use it, people still think >> that STATUS file in trunk is useful. >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/STATUS >> >> I think it contains outdated content. Something gone wrong with its use. How >> can we improve this situation? > > remove outdated content. I'll have a quick look. > >> I think the most useful information is the sandboxes list, > > +1 > >> but it seems just >> the wrong place. > > to me it seems ok. > >> My opinion is that we should try to mantain a STATUS file for each sandbox >> trying to use dates in stuff we write so that people looking into sandboxes >> would have an idea of the motivation, the status and when the last update to >> the status happened. > > I'd rather keep a central file at a central place. But I agree that > sandbox info should be uptodate, more or less ;-). > > Bernd
I did a quick check and cannot find anything wrong with the file except it is outdated. I still believe it could be useful if it was more uptodate. Most of the votes and proposals tracked there are not even resolved on-list. So this only reflects our own habits which is sometimes good to remember as a motivation to try and improve. ;-) Maybe we should remind ourselves from time-to-time (maybe taking a looming board report as a trigger) to maintain it. Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
