On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: >> >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Bernd Fondermann (JIRA) ha scritto: >>>> >>>> [ >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12609623#action_12609623 >>>> ] >>>> Bernd Fondermann commented on JAMES-842: >>>> ---------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Great work, Stefano! Thanks for taking care (also for 841 & 840). >>> >>> Thank you :-) >>> >>> Should we move the "non-james-specific" spring-avalon bridge to an >>> "avalon-spring-library" and just keep the FileSystemBridge+configurations >>> in >>> the spring-deployment module? >> >> I see the motivation for this and think its very worthwhile from an >> architectural POV. > > I just realized that I didn't explain well what I meant.
No, rereading this you did, but reading it for the first time I must have mixed your past remarks in where you said that this spring-avalon adapter might of interest for other projects than James. > I was proposing only to create a james server submodule (like the > core-library module) to host the non-james-specific code. This way the code > would be part of the main james tree (we would have 1 more module, of > course) but it would be cleaner what is the bridge and would be easier to > allow people to just get the bridge and build it (with m2 is already > possible to build a module without the whole project checked out). Well, if _you_ propose to add yet another module, there must be something to it ;-)) <snip/> > And if people agree it is a positive change I would offer myself for the > task (not a big issue, if I don't miss something). +1 Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
