[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12611816#action_12611816
]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on MIME4J-5:
----------------------------------------
> I'm in the middle of struggling to debug a subtle error in advanceToBoundary
> discovered in JAMES IMAP tests. After recursive parsing of an inner mail,
> advanceToBoundary ignores the boundary :-/
Robert,
Did you manage to fix it? Do you have a test case for this problem?
> AIUI whatever is written to tmp is just ignored. Couldn't this (thinking of
> performance) just be a shared buffer rather than created new each time?
Sure. The buffer can be reused.
Oleg
> Mime4j takes really long to parse big messages
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIME4J-5
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-5
> Project: Mime4j
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Norman Maurer
> Assignee: Robert Burrell Donkin
> Fix For: 0.4
>
> Attachments: mime4j-2.patch, mime4j-3.patch, mime4j.patch
>
>
> From ml:
> Mime4j has general demonstrable performance problems:
> http://buni.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137
> http://blog.buni.org/blog/mbarker/Meldware/2007/01/27/Look-out-Its-behind-you
> I'd suggest a general code review for the "byte at a time + buffered input
> stream" anti-pattern
> and general refactoring to do things in blocks where possible.
> -Andy
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
