[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Oleg Kalnichevski updated MIME4J-5:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: mime4j-4.patch

Fixed parsing of complex multipart entities with embedded messages; minor 
performance tweaks (replaced synchronized StringBuffer with unsynchronized 
CharArrayBuffer; changed MimeEntity to re-use temp content buffer)

As far as I can tell all major performance bottlenecks have been eliminated and 
regressions fixed. I believe the issue can be closed.

One minor performance optimization I can think of would be reusing shiftTable 
used by the InputBuffer#indexOf methods but that would come at the expense of 
breaking the principles of encapsulation and exposing implementation details to 
the public API

Robert, you may also want to move some of the new classes from o.a.j.mime4j to 
some other packages, o.a.j.mime4j.util for instance)

Oleg

> Mime4j takes really long to parse big messages
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MIME4J-5
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-5
>             Project: Mime4j
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.3
>            Reporter: Norman Maurer
>            Assignee: Robert Burrell Donkin
>             Fix For: 0.4
>
>         Attachments: mime4j-2.patch, mime4j-3.patch, mime4j-4.patch, 
> mime4j.patch
>
>
> From ml:
> Mime4j has general demonstrable performance problems:
> http://buni.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137
> http://blog.buni.org/blog/mbarker/Meldware/2007/01/27/Look-out-Its-behind-you
> I'd suggest a general code review for the "byte at a time + buffered input 
> stream" anti-pattern
> and general refactoring to do things in blocks where possible.
> -Andy

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to