On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've done some benchmarking of the recent performance improvements in trunk > vs Mime4j 0.3. I must say that the result is very promising! :) > > I did my tests on about 130000 messages, most of them less than 10 kB in > size. All message files had been cached by the Linux file cache when I > conducted the tests so it doesn't take the disk I/O in consideration. I > guess I should also run the tests without the cache but I don't know how to > force it to flush. The test uses the SAX-like parser interface and a > ContentHandler which does nothing (only consumes the data). > > Here are the 0.3 results: > Statistics for all messages (130606) > Total duration: 23830 ms > Average duration: 0.182457 ms > > Statistics for all messages (124480) more than 0 kB and less than 10 kB in > size > Total duration: 15264 ms > Average duration: 0.122622 ms > > Statistics for all messages (5934) more than 10 kB and less than 100 kB in > size > Total duration: 5173 ms > Average duration: 0.871756 ms > > Statistics for all messages (161) more than 100 kB and less than 1000 kB in > size > Total duration: 1033 ms > Average duration: 6.416149 ms > > Statistics for all messages (31) more than 1000 kB in size > Total duration: 2360 ms > Average duration: 76.129032 ms > > > And here are the 0.4 results: > Statistics for all messages (130606) > Total duration: 10069 ms > Average duration: 0.077094 ms > > Statistics for all messages (124480) more than 0 kB and less than 10 kB in > size > Total duration: 8583 ms > Average duration: 0.068951 ms > > Statistics for all messages (5934) more than 10 kB and less than 100 kB in > size > Total duration: 1106 ms > Average duration: 0.186384 ms > > Statistics for all messages (161) more than 100 kB and less than 1000 kB in > size > Total duration: 115 ms > Average duration: 0.714286 ms > > Statistics for all messages (31) more than 1000 kB in size > Total duration: 265 ms > Average duration: 8.548387 ms > > > As you can see 0.4 is about twice as fast on messages less than 10 kB in > size and about 10 times faster for messages larger than 100 kB. That is > quite amazing!
WOW! thanks for benchmarking :-) what else needs to be done before we can ship? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
