On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I propose that we introduce a new kind (or two) of module at the same >>>>> level >>>>> of the api module, so it would be: >>>>> - deployments >>>>> - functions >>>>> - libraries >>>>> - apis | commons | utils >>>>> [...] >>>>> ATM I would go with the -util suffix. >>>> >>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> Opinions? >>>> >>>> as i read this proposal, it's not really adding any more layers, just >>>> allowing more types of module in the lowest layer. basically, we add >>>> one or two more naming conventions for modules that behave like APIs. >>>> i'm reluctant to add more layers and would strongly prefer JAMES to be >>>> coupled just by APIs but this proposal seems a reasonable stepping >>>> stone to me. >>> >>> Cool! Thank you for "rewording" my proposal. You got it exactly how I >>> thought it :-) >> >> i should have the ant for this work very soon > > Cool! If I didn't already give you a kudos on ohloh I should definitely do > this after you took care of implementing my proposal. I didn't expect so > much :-)
don't be so quick to thank me - RemoteDeliveryTest keeps failing (for about the 10 time over the last couple of days) and i don't like committing unless the tests are passing :-/ - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
