Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
I completed my first step in "repackaging" and "remoduling" server.trunk
code.
It is far from being perfect, but at least a first goal is achieved.
Now no package belong to 2 modules considering -util, -api and -library
modules.
[...]
The next steps (as soon as I find the cycles) are:
1. core-library: split it into multiple modules, repackage content to
avoid use of the "generic" packages.
2. take care of packages in functions: they must not reuse packages
already used by api/util/libraries.
Here we are at the end of my second day on this "sprint".
I moved around some more code and main changes are:
A. Packages should no more be repeated in api/libraries/util.
B. No package used by api/libraries/util is used in functions (A+B means
that I'm not sure if we have functions using the same packages)
C. Renamed mailnotification-util to javamail-util (at the end of the 2
days refactoring it made more sense because of dependencies/content).
D. Introduced core-api to contain basic service interfaces
(org.apache.james.services) from core-library. (I also moved some of
org.apache.james.services to functions when they were not used by other
modules).
E. Introduced a management-library module to contain management stuff
(after I refactored code to be selfcontained in that package). Only
RemoteManager-function currently depends on this.
F. Introduced a core-function module to host all of the code from
core-library that was not used by other functions and reduce the size of
this core-library as it already is the most used dependency.
I don't plan further major changes after this one, but I have to take
the time to review the resulting structure with my tools.
There are still some utilities in core-library that should be checked.
I still have issues with some module "granularization" but I can't see a
better solution now. The main goal of this was packages separation and
smaller core-library.
Currently hudson fail because of svn issues I have to investigate. I'm
not sure if the ant/m2 builds works now and if the resulting binary
works. I'm testing this now.
I don't know what's next.. I have to relax and look at the "new" tree
after cooling down.
Please review and tell if you see improvement over the previous tree or
you prefer to revert this 2 days big-bang.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
