On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:10:26PM +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Oleg Kalnichevski ha scritto: > >Please vote on releasing these packages as James Mime4j 0.4. The vote is > >open for the next 72 hours, and only votes from James PMC members are > >considered binding. The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes > >are cast. > > > >Packages: > >http://people.apache.org/~olegk/mime4j-0.4/packages/ > > I want to add the fact that I'm investigating about the IPR for the > Base64OutputStream I introduced in the codebase some weeks ago. > > http://markmail.org/message/g6cqks56o6byu4fx > http://markmail.org/message/fv7njent2jg2whdz > http://markmail.org/message/cgf5ugtwcrr4fwcd > > The fact is that the package I used to get the Base64OutputStream has a > NOTICE including: > ------------- > Portions of this software were originally based on the following: > > - software copyright (c) 2000-2006, Oracle Corp, > <http://www.oracle.com/>. and are licensed to the Apache Software > Foundation under the "Software Grant and Corporate Contribution License > Agreement" > ------------- > I didn't recognized this when I took the code at first, my bad! > > I believe Base64OutputStream was not part of the Oracle contribution, > but it's not clear yet. I hope MyFaces PMC will reply soon about this > and will confirm that we are ok with that. > > Not sure if, in case of a negative response, this should be a blocker or > not. > > Stefano >
Why should this be a blocker as the notice clearly states ASF should have a grant and a CCLA covering that code? Oleg > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
