On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >>>> >>>> i think i'm just about ready to move the IMAP related code (including >>>> mailbox etc) out from trunk and into protocols. hopefully, this should >>>> reduce the time that trunk takes to build and make the remaining >>>> codebase more accessible. i'll probably do a copy-then-prune followed >>>> by deletion in trunk. IMAP will be accessible as a set of libraries >>>> from pheonix-deployment. >>>> >>>> any objections? >>> >>> Can you add somewhere in one of the 2 codebases the list of classes you >>> cloned to separate them? I'd like to have a good understanding (even in >>> few >>> months) of what we duplicated around. >> >> copies tend to diverge but if you want i will do my best. how would >> like me to record this information? > > Start with a reply to this mail... :-) > I'll understand if it worth registering it in a file in svn once I know the > content.
except for the functional tests, i'm forking on a per-module basis https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-862 indicates that i forked CRLFOutputStream >>> I checked out the illustrative sandbox but it does not build because of >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-862. The fixes for that >>> issues >>> have been done in trunk and not in the sandbox. >>> >>> In the illustrative sandbox I see user-api in both product. I guess this >>> is >>> not what you intend as the result.. so I'm not sure I understand what is >>> the >>> purpose of the sandbox. >> >> the sandbox allowed me to trial the operation and find out what >> changes i needed to make in trunk before i could separate the >> codebases. it also illustrated how this operation could be performed. > > I cannot +1 a "-=IMAP" if I don't know what is the result of this. > > The sandbox includes user-api and phoenix-deployment. Are they intended to > be copied in the imap part, too? Otherwise can you update the sandbox to > show the final modules of your changes or alternatively write a list of > moved folders and a list of copied folders? > > What will be the resulting dependency link between the 2 projects? > imap jars will be in server stage and they will be imported only from > deployment? just deploy > I'm not sure I understand if the avalon-socket-library is used by the imap > modules or not. shouldn't be. the IMAP binding is in deployment. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
