On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: >> >> Author: rdonkin >> Date: Sat Sep 6 03:41:26 2008 >> New Revision: 692627 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=692627&view=rev >> Log: >> Created directory to house protocols separated from server >> >> Added: >> james/protocols/ > > Maybe IMAP is big enough to deserve a top level component (james/imap) so we > don't increase our tree depth more than what we have now. > > mailet > - mailet-api > - mailet-base > - mailet-crypto > - mailet-standard > - maven-mailet-report > server > - user-api > - ... > - phoenix-deployment > jspf > - resolver > - tester > mime4j > jsieve > - (maybe will be splitted) > postage > > > Adding a protocols increases the current tree depth from 2 to 3, while we > only need imap ATM. > imap > - imap-api > - ... > - imap-function > > So I would prefer to have imap and not protocols and we can introduce > protocols later once we'll have more than one product in there.
we discussed this before and your suggestion (which i agreed with) was to adopt a design like mailet. i think mailet is working out quite well. it's reasonably easy to create a good subsite. this process is very much a draft and should be subject to a later review once everything's more complete. so i'd much rather trial your original proposal for a while. it shouldn't be a big issue to reorganise stuff later. i don't propose putting up a website etc until the changes have had a chance to bed in and be reviewed. we may well end up deciding then that it's better to switch to your new proposal. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
