Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
AFACT there's consensus that configuration file compatibility is
crucial for users of james.
Well, it was in 2006 when we proposed to branch for release.
I'm not strong at having this as a requirement now.
Just I'd like to not ask users to switch every time, so if we change it
let's do once and let's try to not change again at the following release.
1 do we have a schema for the configuration file?
No.
2 moving forward, would it be convenient to use an object model to
decouple configuration from avalon?
Maybe our only alternative...
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
