On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> ATM there are a number of concrete mocks contained in >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/base/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/mock/. >> they aren't unit tests and have no dependencies on junit but are >> useful when creating unit tests. i think they'd be better in main, >> probably repackaged into org.apache.mailet.base.mock. >> >> opinions? > > I prefer to use tests because tests is where I look for similar things, > but I'm not strong on this and I've no objections to this, if this helps > you moving forward.
i'm agnostic the packaging needs to be rationalised. not particularly sure about the best package: org.apache.mailet.base.test.mock? org.apache.mailet.base.mock? org.apache.mailet.base.test? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
