Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i think that it should be possible to move the sieve mailet (and the
>>>>>>>> dependent mdn micro-library) from server into the jsieve project.
>>>>>>>> AFAICT samples contains only a mailet example so i think this can be
>>>>>>>> removed. unless anyone can see anything wrong with this approach, i'll
>>>>>>>> probably just dive in sometime soonish...
>>>>>>> Sounds good!
>>>>>> done
>>>>> not quite: i missed the dependency between the
>>>>> org.apache.james.util.mail.mdn and
>>>>> org.apache.james.util.mail.MimeMultipartReport. this is used by other
>>>>> mailets so it's not really possible to move it out into sieve.
>>>>>
>>>>> i suppose that one possibility might be to move some or all of the
>>>>> stuff in javamail-util into mailet-base
>>>> the stuff currently in javamail utils is packaged
>>>> org.apache.james.util but is mostly used by mailets and is (mostly)
>>>> not strongly coupled to the rest of the server. moving most of the
>>>> contents to mailet-base (and the rest to mailet-function module in the
>>>> server) would allow this module to eliminated and allow more mailets
>>>> (including sieve) to be factored out of the server code base.
>>>>
>>>> any objections?
>>> Most code can be moved but SpamAssassinInvoker.java seems a bit off
>>> topic in mailet-base.
>> yes : i think that belongs with the spam assassin mailet
> 
> the class is shared with the spam assassin fail fast plugin so it'll
> have to stay where it is for now

I knew it is used by both a mailet and a fastfail plugin, and that's why
it was in the javamail-util package. But mailet-base seems a wrong place
for it to me. BTW nothing is definitive, so we can move where it gives
less problems now, then we'll think to better places in a future cycle.

Stefano

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to