On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Steve Brewin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on: 21 > November 2008 15:42 > >> SieveToMultiMailbox doesn't seem such a good name now that it's been >> factored out from james. any ideas for a better one? >> >> SieveMailboxMailet? SieveMailet? any other ideas? >> >> - robert > > How about standardising on a Sieve mailet naming scheme of "Sieve[function > description]Mailet" where [function description] does what it says? This > naming scheme leaves room for future Sieve mailets. Using this naming > scheme, "SieveMailboxMailet" is fine.
good plan there are some other ways that Sieve might be used so this gives room for future expansion - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
