Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i'm unhappy about the impact of this resolution for direct users of this method
Robert,
What would you like done differently?
Oleg
- robert
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:26 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: olegk
Date: Sun Dec 7 07:26:00 2008
New Revision: 724142
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=724142&view=rev
Log:
MIME4J-90: Consistent parsing of header field names
Contributed by Markus Wiederkehr <markus.wiederkehr at gmail.com>
Modified:
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/field/Field.java
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/message/Header.java
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/message/SimpleContentHandler.java
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/AbstractEntity.java
james/mime4j/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/field/FieldTest.java
...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
