On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>>>> comments inside...
>>>>> 2008/12/13 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>> I think before the defunc it get called somewhere in the processor
>>>>> chain todo the mapping. At the moment it seems the virtualuser-store
>>>>> will get never used. Can you maybe give me some pointers where I can
>>>>> dig a bit deeper ?
>>>>
>>>> i'll take a look but i'm not familiar with this area so it may take a
>>>> little while...
>>>
>>> haven't managed to find the day to track down the problem and
>>> demonstrate that it's fixed with an integration test but i did fix a
>>> bug i'd introduced on friday which stopped the spool working. i have a
>>> test for that so hopefully it should stay fixed now.
>>>
>>> i'm working on a test for the virtual user stuff but if you are in a
>>> rush, it might be worthwhile just updating and retrying again.
>>
>> ATM the standard james configuration has a virtual user block (which
>> allows mappings to be added and removed through the remote manager)
>> but the mailet configuration uses RecipientIsLocal which is not
>> virtual host aware. i can't find a suitable matcher that uses the new
>> VUT interfaces. shouldn't be too difficult to create one, though.
>
> ok
>
> i think that the root cause of this issue is that James does not use
> the VUT stuff when implementing the isLocalXXX calls in MailContext. i
> think that the correct approach would be to add support into James and
> make virtual users a core supported feature in james 3.
>
> unless anyone has any objections, i will dive in and implement.

spoke too soon

after taking a better look at the code, need to set up some more
configuration stuff in james

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to