Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Bernd Fondermann > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 17:38, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Development of mime4j has considerably gained speed, with added >>>> committers and successful releases. >>>> >>>> Mime4j discussions comprise a large part of the mail on server-dev. >>>> >>>> Mime4j is independent of our server product and used outside of JAMES. >>>> >>>> While we do not know whether or not mime4j will really become a project >>>> of its own, it seems due time to give it more space to expand on a >>>> seperate mailing list to foster this ongoing process. >>>> >>>> So I propose to establish the mailing list >>>> >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> for all mime4j product related discussion. >>> [X] +/-0, I don't care >>> >>> In fact "I do care", but I'm fine with what active people need. >>> >>> Will svn notifications for the mime4j tree be moved there, too? >> Good question. I think we should move that, too. Just like for mailet-api. >> But I'm open to other opinions here. If anybody wants to separate this >> from this vote, we can do so. > > i don't have strong feelings about this one
IMHO moving discussions to its own list while leaving svn notification (and JIRA notifications!?!) to server-dev is the worst scenario at all. Either we have: 1) mime4j-dev@ receving discussions/JIRA/svn for mime4j server-dev@ receving discussions/JIRA/svn for every other product but mailets. or 2) we introduce the already discussed "notifications" list where we redirect all of the JIRA/svn/continuous integration notifications for all of the james products. I think #1 should be the direct result of this vote if/when it passes. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
