On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > Markus Wiederkehr wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Folks >>> >>> Take it for what it is worth to you. >>> >>> In the HttpClient / HttpComponents land we have to deal with lots of >>> various HTTP protocol violations (or shall I say imperfections). There >>> has always been a lot of requests from users to incorporate workarounds >>> for their immediate problems into the stock version of HttpClient. The >>> only feasible approach that worked for us was to provide a plug-in >>> mechanism for components that might require different degree of >>> tolerance to a particular type of HTTP messages and to let the users >>> provide custom implementations that suited their specific application >>> needs. >>> >>> Oleg >> >> I like that idea.. What mechanism do you use to inject the plug-ins? >> System properties or something more sophisticated? >> > > We use basic constructor / setter injection, so that the users could put > things together either with a DI framework of their choice or manually.
+1 properties are hard to manage in container environments - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
