Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >>> i think it's time to add James 3.x to the website. The website build >>> now works but some more work is needed on the content. >>> >>> i was wondering about the best way to link to this content from >>> http://james.apache.org/server/. probably need to indicate that 3 is >>> unstable, perhaps by using 'Server 3 (Unstable)' >>> >>> opinions? >> We could leave just the version numbers as we already are in the >> "Server" menu: >> --------- >> 2.3.1 >> 2.3.0 >> 2.2.0 >> 3.0-dev >> --------- >> >> And IMHO "dev" is slightly better than "unstable". > > in the end, i went for 'Development 3.0' since it seemed to read a > little easier (see http://james.apache.org/server/) > > i used http://james.apache.org/server/head/index.html for the subsite > (since there were a number of places where 'head' was already used)
+1 > i've added a Mailets menu section linking to internal MailetDocs and > external products cool! > i wonder whether > http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_matchers.html and > http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_mailets.html could be > usefully consolidated into MailetDocs somehow It is a matter of manually checking that all of the content in provided_* is already in javadocs and then we could remove it. It's a long and boring task :-( > opinions and feedback welcomed :-) You did a very good job :-) Thank you, Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
