On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> a second release candidate for apache-crypto-mailets is now available >>> from http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/apache-crypto-mailets/1.0RC2/ >>> >>> please take a few minutes to review what will be - unless issues are >>> found - the final release candidate >> >> i'd like to cut FC this weekend so please take a look sometime soon
thanks stefano :-) > Major: NOTICE and LICENSE from the binary distribution seems to be wrong > (they don't reference stuff in the lib folder). the DEPENDENCIES is correct and each library has a LICENSE shipped so it's covered it's probably it would be better to use the same LICENSE and NOTICE as source (rather than the maven generated ones), so i've switch the build to do that. > Minor: the binary dist include a "javadocs" and a "site" folder. They > both contain the javadocs (duplicate content). i've been trying to persuade maven to generate the site for the release but it doesn't want too :-/ i've stopped the site being copied in since 'javadocs' is a better name > Trivial: The sources include an empty tree org.apache.james.transport thanks should be removed now > Question: I see we have both build.xml and pom.xml: I guess you used > mvn. Does the build.xml still works fine? Otherwise maybe it is better > to change the default goal to say something about using maven or to > remove it (or maybe a simple comment on top of the file). build.xml still works for me but i've added an echo to the default ant target i'll cut another release candidate tomorrow - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
