i think we're close to being able to ship a standard-mailets 1.0 i've analysed the diffs between 2.3.1 and standard mailets. the results are at http://james.apache.org/mailet/standard/release-notes.html. only minimal changes were made in 3.x.
i favour repackaging to org.apache.james.mailet.standard before release some pros: * consistent with the treatment of crypto * plays better with OSGi * existing 2.3 users can add the jar and alter the package prefixing some cons: * existing users will (one day) need to add "org.apache.james.mailet.standard" to their configurations (breaking compatibility but quite an easy upgrade) opinions? any other work we need to do? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
