I agree with Steve. Vincenzo On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Steve Brewin <sbre...@synsys.com> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:robertburrelldon...@gmail.com] wrote on: 12 > June 2009 14:06 > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Stefano > > Bagnara<apa...@bago.org> wrote: > > > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > >> i'd like to try to release the long delayed 2.3.2 > > >> > > >> anyone else like to see a 2.3.2 release? > > >> > > >> there's only one remaining issue: unless anyone wants to commit > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-875 (i'm agnostic) , i > > >> propose to push to 2.4 > > > > > > If JAMES-875 lands 2.3.2 I'll use it in a couple of > > production server > > > where I'm currently using a v2.3 branch build + JAMES-875. > > While I agree > > > it may cause backward incompatibility IMO it is a long > > standing critical > > > bug and should be included, but I don't care enough to push this. > > > > i'm agnostic but the consensus seems to be shipping with JAMES-875 in > > > > any objections? > > > > - robert > > Not from me. Behaving correctly seems eminently reasonable. > > Cheers > --Steve > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org > >
