On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > What do you guys prefer ? Using "plain" JCR stuff or using Jackrabbit > OCM ? Since with OCM we are able to store in any JCR-170 conform > Repository too, I'm in favor of it guys it will make mapping / > queries etc easier... (at least for me ;))
i would have done it using plain (easier for me) but i'd be equally happy with OCM (in terms of performance, the big gains are asynchronous IO and direct streaming for mail bodies. just need to remember to ensure load big bodies don't get loaded all the time) - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
