On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/1/17 Norman Maurer <[email protected]>: >> Ok, I have now every implementation in place except one for >> nntpserver. To be hornest I would be +1 for just remove the whole >> nntpserver stuff. IMHO, its just a left over from the "old days" and >> not maintained anyway. I don't think anyone is using it anyway. So >> what about just remove the whole nntpserver stuff . If we really find >> some usecase we can "merge" it back later. > > +1 nntp has always been very basic and its storage was not compatible > with pop3, so it is mainly some protocol code. It doesn't support most > stuff one would expect from an nntp server, so it is ok to remove it > and if anyone will ever need that he will help reintegrating the > protocol back.
i'm starting to factor out an NNTP product. if anyone wants me to leave NNTP in trunk, shout very soon. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
