[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836588#action_12836588
]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-956:
-------------------------------------
Hi Mario,
I have now a proof of concept for using camel for the matcher/mailet processor
workin ( I will commit it soon), so it should be really straight forward to
replace the current used consumer and producer with JMS. So my next task after
the code is committed and maybe a bit cleanup is done, would be to target the
jms spooling. Is there still some interest by you to work on this ? Just so we
don't try to tackle the same stuff ;)
Bye,
Norman
> work on james-server-experimental-activemq-function
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-956
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-956
> Project: JAMES Server
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: SpoolManager & Processors
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Mario Zsilak
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Hi,
> I'm very interested in using james with active-mq (or any other message
> broker) .
> My Plan is to:
> -) write an SMTP handler which replaces the current
> org.apache.james.smtpserver.integration.SendMailHandler and puts the message
> into MQ
> -) write a spool manager which listens on messages an processes them, if a
> message would be "moved" to a different processor, then it shall be put into
> a different MQ and/or distinguishable in a other way ... (don't not yet)
> -) review and extend the current active-mq stuff
> In the end I want to be able to use a bunch of james servers which are
> connected through a commen message broker.
> what do you guys think about this?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
