Ups I mean

      <connectionBacklog>200</connectionBacklog>

in smtpserver.xml

Bye,
Norman

2010/5/2 Eric Charles <eric.char...@u-mangate.com>:
> Hi Norman,
> What do you mean with "...backlock in smtpserver.log" ?
> Tks,
> Eric
>
> On 05/02/2010 01:15 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> for such high load you will need to adjust a few things:
>>
>> 1) set a higher ulimit. By default its 1024 on linux which is prolly
>> not enough ( I use fbsd which use 11095 by default)
>> 2) set a higher connection backlock in smtpserver.log
>>
>>
>> Bye,
>> Norman
>>
>>
>> 2010/5/2 Eric Charles<eric.char...@u-mangate.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Norman,
>>>
>>> Trying to simulate a more real-life test case, I developed a small bomber
>>> class that launches parallel threads. Each thread sends mails with
>>> attachements (with small pause between each mail sending).
>>>
>>> I tested with embedded derby with JDBCDomainList.
>>>
>>> Depending on the parameters (10 to 100 parallel threads, 5 ms to 100 ms
>>> pause, 1KB to 100KB attachement), I could have on my dev laptop 5 to 10
>>> mails per second being processed.
>>>
>>> The good think is that I have no exception at all during stable phase.
>>>
>>> However, I was not able to have more mails being processed on my latptop
>>> due
>>> to disk access. The CPU and memory are really not charged (20 - 30 %),
>>> but
>>> disk is really working non-stop.
>>> This is probably the price to pay for activemq and the kahadb.
>>>
>>> Complete scenario with unstable phase:
>>> - Bomb 5 minutes
>>> - Stop bomb.
>>> - Still some mails are spooled for a while which is quite normal.
>>> - When all mails are spooled, disk still runs crazy for minutes, console
>>> showing a few messages "Slow KahaDB access: cleanup took 684"
>>> - rebombing : org.apache.camel.CamelExecutionException: Exception
>>> occurred
>>> during execution on the exchange: Exchange[Message:
>>> org.apache.james.core.maili...@16863f2] Caused by: java.io.IOException:
>>> Too
>>> many open files - error message in the bomber
>>> - Server console show still a few mails being spooled.
>>> - After, server does not respond on socket - no more exception.
>>>
>>> Disk congestion may come from my disk.
>>> I will setup a server environment with good disk, and will rerun the test
>>> in
>>> a few days.
>>> A database on a separate server could also help.
>>>
>>> Btw, what should we consider as acceptable/needed as load (xxx mails from
>>> yyy parallel clients) ?
>>>
>>> Tks,
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/01/2010 09:25 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> About 6000, then I run out of heap space..
>>>>
>>>> Can you maybe try to deploy it with james and bomb it via smtp ? I was
>>>> not able to see any exception.
>>>>
>>>> Thx,
>>>> Norman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2010/5/1 Eric Charles<eric.char...@u-mangate.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Norman,
>>>>>
>>>>> Similar exceptions with properties.put("openjpa.LockTimeout", "30000");
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the environment simply can not follow the load (more than one
>>>>> mail
>>>>> sent each ms).
>>>>> Bootleneck can be anywhere (connection creation, database lock,
>>>>> openjpa,...).
>>>>> This is why I put a sleep between each mail sending.
>>>>> Real servers will better hold the pressure.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I think I'm limited by my environment : it does not allow me to have
>>>>> a
>>>>> really heavy load to validate that IMAP-137 is resolved.
>>>>> Well, it is probably, as before you commits, I directly had the
>>>>> duplicate
>>>>> key exception.
>>>>>
>>>>> How much mails can you hold on your env with h2 inmemory ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/01/2010 09:08 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thx for your tests. The order of the uid is caused by the threads,
>>>>>> thats nothing to worry about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About the timeout, can you try to add this to the test case:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> properties.put("openjpa.LockTimeout", "30000");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And keep in mind that we don't use any connection pooling in the test
>>>>>> case so the performance should be better when use it in deployment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bye,
>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2010/5/1 Eric Charles<eric.char...@u-mangate.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just tested the JPAStressTest (for IMAP-137 JPA fails to persist
>>>>>>> MailboxMembership Entity on heavy load) Norman committed yesterday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I made some tests towards derby (memory and embedded) , h2 (memory
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> embedded) and mysql with following configs (and adding the needed
>>>>>>> jdbc
>>>>>>> drivers in pom.xml):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        // Derby Memory
>>>>>>>        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionDriverName",
>>>>>>> org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver.class.getName());
>>>>>>>        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionURL",
>>>>>>> "jdbc:derby:memory:derbyimap;create=;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        // Derby Embedded
>>>>>>> //        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionDriverName",
>>>>>>> org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver.class.getName());
>>>>>>> //        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionURL",
>>>>>>> "jdbc:derby:derbyimap;create=ser=root;password=root");
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        // H2 Memory
>>>>>>> //        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionDriverName",
>>>>>>> org.h2.Driver.class.getName());
>>>>>>> //        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionURL",
>>>>>>> "jdbc:h2:mem:h2imap;DB_CLOSE_DELAY=>>>>>
>>>>>>>        // H2 Embedded
>>>>>>> //        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionDriverName",
>>>>>>> org.h2.Driver.class.getName());
>>>>>>> //        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionURL",
>>>>>>> "jdbc:h2:~/h2/h2imap;USER=ASSWORD=root");
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        //Mysql
>>>>>>> //        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionDriverName",
>>>>>>> com.mysql.jdbc.Driver.class.getName());
>>>>>>> //        properties.put("openjpa.ConnectionURL",
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/msqlimap?user=assword=root&createDatabaseIfNotExist=true&amp;useUnicode=true&amp;characterEncoding=utf-8");
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I first changed the maximum number of messages from 1.000 to 100.000
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> saw
>>>>>>> on my linux dev PC (james server, stresstest and databases all
>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> same dev PC):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Derby: after many mails sending:
>>>>>>> java.io.IOException: Too many open files
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-1044"
>>>>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>>> org/apache/james/imap/api/display/HumanReadableText
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> H2: after 400 mails:
>>>>>>> java.io.IOException: Too many open files
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Caused by:<openjpa-1.2.2-r422266:898935 nonfatal general error>
>>>>>>> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceException: Timeout trying
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> lock
>>>>>>> table MEMBERSHIP [50200-79] {prepstmnt 406576
>>>>>>> INSERT INTO Membership (mailboxId, uid, answered, deleted, draft,
>>>>>>>        flagged, internalDate, recent, seen, size, MESSAGE_ID)
>>>>>>>    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
>>>>>>> [params= 1, (long) 49, (int) 0, (int) 0, (int) 0, (int) 0,
>>>>>>> (Timestamp)
>>>>>>> 2010-05-01 08:37:10.293, (int) 0, (int) 0, (int) 25, (long) 4151]}
>>>>>>> [codeP200, state=0]
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MySql : after +/- 1000 (always around 1002 and 1007) mails :
>>>>>>> Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-84"<openjpa-1.2.2-r422266:898935
>>>>>>> nonfatal user error>
>>>>>>>  org.apache.openjpa.persistence.NoResultException:
>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>> query on candidate type "class
>>>>>>> org.apache.james.imap.jpa.mail.model.JPAMailbox" with filter "SELECT
>>>>>>> mailbox
>>>>>>> FROM Mailbox mailbox WHERE mailbox.mailboxId =ram" was configured to
>>>>>>> have a unique result, but no instance matched the query.
>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>> org.apache.james.imap.mailbox.MailboxNotFoundException: Mailbox
>>>>>>> '#mail.INBOX' not found.
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3 different databases, 3 different behaviour/exceptions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Running 3 components (james server, stresstest, database) on my
>>>>>>> "not-so-strong-PC" may be an issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To make the tests successful, I added a Thread.sleep(5) (15 ms for
>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>> derby and h2) between each mail sending.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suppose we can say that in a real environment, the load will never
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> heavy, and that real server will perform better.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I also saw that the uid order is not respected:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Append message with uidb58
>>>>>>> Append message with uidb59
>>>>>>> Append message with uidb56
>>>>>>> Append message with uidb57
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This could come from a print mismatch, and not from uid being
>>>>>>> generated
>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>> bad order.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tks in advance for your feedbacks, if any,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to