Hey, when doing this, we could as well unify the artifact names. We have names like apache-james-imap-* (both, apache and james) james-server-* (only james) apache-mailet-* (only apache)
I'm aware that this is no particularly helpful/urgent contribution of mine, but in the long term consistency and a clear structure pay out, I think. Let me know if I can be of any help with this. Tim Am Samstag, den 29.05.2010, 09:36 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer: > Hi Tim, > > I agree it should get moved out of the imap namespace. I delayed that > to make it not do complicated by just introduce another dependency on > a mini-library. But yeah its something we should do... > > Bye, > Norman > > > 2010/5/29 Tim-Christian Mundt <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > since both IMAP and POP3 use the same backend, now > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-983), shouldn't the storage > > packages rather be moved from the IMAP library to the server module? > > They are not IMAP specific any more. Maybe, they could get their own > > "mailstore" library which both the IMAP library and the server depend > > on. > > > > Regards > > Tim > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
