On 11 Jun 2010, at 09:26, Norman Maurer wrote: > Hi all, > > before we release M1 of james-server I would like to rework the maven2 > structure of james server . I think we should move some packages > around to be able to better support OSGI in the future. I think many > of the modules are just a left over from the time back when we used > ant. For example the core-library and core-function module. I think > this should get merged. Then we have the different implementations of > many services. Most times we have a db and fs implementation. I think > we should seperate them too. So we could create "cleaner" osgi bundles > later. > > Thoughts ?
Having cleaner modularisation from an OSGi point of view would certainly help those that want to use parts of James inside an OSGi environment, by simply depending on the bundles rather than having to role your own or embed. How these are constructed? I don't have enough information or experience with James to know, but I would hope that where are only 4 or 5 bundles max for a configuration of James bundles. Ian > > Bye, > Norman > > Ps: I think I will start to work on this at the weekend, we can revert > it later if we think it was a bad idea ... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
