[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12885261#action_12885261
]
Tim-Christian Mundt commented on IMAP-178:
------------------------------------------
Ok, that was probably a little confusing. The interface I was referring to is
"org.apache.james.imap.message.response.NamespaceResponse.Namespace". Of course
the IMAP namespace extension (http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2342.html) needs
a hierarchy delimiter, but is is not really part of the namespace as far as I
understand.
On the other hand as part of NamespaceResponse it models the response - which
has a prefix and a delimiter, I think we should leave it.
> make namespaces simple String
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: IMAP-178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-178
> Project: JAMES Imap
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tim-Christian Mundt
>
> A namespace is merely a string in IMAP - a name. However, in James it is
> represented by an interface containing a prefix an a delimiter. The prefix is
> the name and the delimiter is the one that as passed around in James
> everywhere, so it shouldn't be part of the namespace. For IMAP there is even
> no need to separate the namespace from the mailbox name. Still - for
> convenience - we should put a dot at the end of the namespace names.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
