Hi, [ ] +1 Please release the artifacts (non-binding)
We should soon release a new James version in order to get more attention and developers and feedback. However, I still find it just logical to split the storage packages from the imap project. Moreover, before the next final release it is crucial to clean up the configuration in a way Eric pointed out (unify notation) and make it simpler. Tim Am Samstag, den 11.09.2010, 22:18 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer: > Hi all, > > its a long time since we started to work on the imap code for james. I > think now its time to cut the first release a.k.a 0.1. > > This release includes also the new mailbox api for james. This > includes the following implementations: > * JPA > * Torque (deprecated) > * JCR > * Maildir > * InMemory. > > This is one of the last missing pieces for cutting a milestone for > james server too. > > So please review and cast your vote: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-013/ > > [ ] +1 Please release the artifacts > [ ] +0 No time for review > [ ] -1 Something is wrong or we are not ready for a release yet. > > > Bye, > Norman > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
