2010/10/24 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sounds good :) I think using JMX calls would be preferable .. > > IIRC RemoteManager has issues which prevent the rest of james moving > forward. though i find RemoteManager useful and had some plans, i > think removing it from trunk would be the best strategy. > > i would prefer an independent management product for james (whether > using JMX transport or not) to an integrated one. if anyone is > interested then coding up something based on whatever's useful in > RemoteManager in a sandbox then that'd work for me much better than > trying to work within james.
+1 Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
