2 different persistences (mailbox, mailrepository) for mails sounds
curious, but there are for different purposes (mailbox for users' mails,
mailrespository for the rest such as spam, virus).
Even if I was pro- for the merging of both, it seems that users' mailbox
should be much hacked to store "rest" mails (the spam, the virus,...).
For example, users having jpa mailbox would have an additional table to
persist the spam... What about maildir which is well defined and should
be extended to support a "spam" dir.
So a // storage such as the current mailrepository is probably the less
intrusive option, even if we have to duplicate all the persistence
adapters (database, file, jcr, nosql,...).
Tks,
Eric
On 28/12/2010 11:16, Norman Maurer wrote:
Well I think it still can be used to store Mail objects from Mailets.
Or you think we would be better of to just use the "Mailbox API" there
too ? At the moment the Mailbox API only supports users mailboxes so
its not really a good fit as far as I can tell..
Bye,
Norman
2010/12/28 Stefano Bagnara<[email protected]>:
So the Repository stuff should not be used at all in James 3.
Maybe we should leave it there only for people having to migrate data.
I see we probably need replacement for ToRepository with a couple of mailets:
1) A mailet that write the message to a specific folder of a specific mailbox.
2) A mailet that stores the mimemessage as a plain mime file in a folder.
Stefano
2010/12/28 Norman Maurer<[email protected]>:
Hi there,
Mailbox store kind of simple streams with some metadata (its the
mailbox project stuff). MailRepository is the old one we used in james
2.3 for INBOX and as basis for the SpoolRepository. In the current
james its only used for storing Mails via the ToRepository Mailet..
Bye,
Norman
2010/12/28 Stefano Bagnara<[email protected]>:
What do we store in each one?
Does Mailbox contains Mail objects, javamail MimeMessage, simple streams?
Is MailRepository the "old one" containing Mail objects?
What about renaming MailRepository to EnvelopeRepository and the store
to EnvelopeRepositoryRegistry?
Stefano
2010/12/28 Eric Charles<[email protected]>:
Hi,
MailRepository is ambiguous with Mailbox.
MailRepositoryStore used to list all available MailRepositories is not as
self-explanatory as we would want.
We can continue to used those names and bring documentation to explain them
such as in http://james.apache.org/server/3/feature-persistence.html or we
could try to find new ones.
Some compound name with "Mail" inside (after all, it goes over mails) would
give something like "MailDepot" or "MailBin".
Do you think these are more distinctive from Mailbox?
Have you any other ideas?
Tks,
Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
