[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982082#action_12982082
]
Norman Maurer commented on IMAP-246:
------------------------------------
Do we really need this ? From RFC:
The server MAY consider a client inactive if it has an IDLE command
running, and if such a server has an inactivity timeout it MAY log
the client off implicitly at the end of its timeout period. Because
of that, clients using IDLE are advised to terminate the IDLE and
re-issue it at least every 29 minutes to avoid being logged off.
This still allows a client to receive immediate mailbox updates even
though it need only "poll" at half hour intervals.
> Use different read timeout when in IDLE
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: IMAP-246
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-246
> Project: JAMES Imap
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Protocol
> Reporter: Niklas Therning
> Assignee: Niklas Therning
> Fix For: 0.2
>
>
> If the client doesn't send anything within the configured read timeout the
> connection will be closed. During IDLE I think there should be another
> timeout which is typically configured to be a lot higher than the ordinary
> read timeout.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
