switch to jackrabbit 2.3?? but of course i don't know what are the implications, so this is just a suggestion if it is only a little bit of work
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Forgot to say that jackrabbit 2.3 will using lucene 3.x. > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2415 > > Bye, > Norman > > 2011/2/15 Norman Maurer <[email protected]>: > > Hi there, > > > > I worked on some lucene based solution to provide some high > > performance Message search which is needed for IMAP SEARCH command. So > > far the implementation works out very well and will make it easy to > > support some more search stuff easy. > > > > See: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-10 > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1070933&view=rev > > > > The implementation is written in such a way as it is usable with every > > Mailbox implementation ( in theory ;)). The only problem I'm facing is > > with our usage of jackrabbit. Jackrabbit is lucene 2.x for its > > indexes, but the LuceneMessageSearchIndex need lucene 3.0.x. So what > > should we do to not get in trouble with the different versions of > > lucene. With osgi we could handle it without problems but we not > > support osgi yet. > > > > So any thoughts ? > > > > Bye, > > Norman > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
