go ahead... Bye, Norman
2011/2/25, Felix Knecht <[email protected]>: > On 02/25/2011 11:57 AM, Eric Charles wrote: >> Hi Felix, >> >> I'm with you for 1). > > Not sure about how many 'votes' are needed to make a decision. But if > nobody objects I'll start to eliminate these kind of parent poms and > provide them via Jira as patch. > >> >> Btw, if you've got commit right to james trunk, I think you can commit >> directly your changes (in general, referring to a JIRA). >> We apply CTR, so we can always talk about your commits if needed. >> Norman, can you confirm this ? >> >> Tks, >> - Eric >> >> >> On 25/02/2011 10:34, Norman wrote: >>> Hi Felix, >>> >>> thanks for starting this. >>> >>> I vote for 1) ;) >>> >>> Bye, >>> Norman >>> >>> Am 24.02.2011 17:27, schrieb Felix Knecht: >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> There exists ATM both alternatives about the location of the parent >>>> pom.xml (see also [1]) >>>> >>>> "About the parent poms: >>>> 1.- some projects use the root/pom.xml as parent (james server >>>> project does that) >>>> 2. others create a root/parent/pom.xml specific project." [2] >>>> >>>> e.g. >>>> - james/server uses 1. >>>> - james/imap uses 2. >>>> >>>> I think it would be easier to understand for project newbies (like >>>> me) if this could be harmonized to use either 1. or 2. >>>> >>>> Regarding maven-site-plugin used for site generation it's much easier >>>> to use 1. because this way the site(s) can be generated as multi-module. >>>> IMO it's also easier to read when just having a single parent pom >>>> than having (for the same project) a grandparent pom, referenced by a >>>> parent pom, in which we build the children (<modules>) which >>>> reference the grandparent pom as parent pom (2.). Sounds weird, >>>> doesn't it ;-)? >>>> >>>> When now deploying e.g. the generated site of james/imap first the >>>> site of the (grand)parent is deployed to {url} and afterwards it gets >>>> overridden by the root (parent), which is deployed to the same {url} >>>> >>>> I'd like to open the discussion about either switching all james >>>> projects to 1. or to 2. >>>> >>>> Not hard to guess that my preference is 1. >>>> >>>> WDOT? >>>> >>>> Kind regards >>>> Felix >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg31430.html >>>> [2] >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg31440.html >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
