There was issue with hardware. possibly we can achieve better performance with new setup.
Thanks for reply. kushal On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:50 PM, kushal soy <[email protected]> wrote: > i am using local users only > > defining performance: Total message sent from client/Total time taken to > deliver messages into inbox > [Number of mail delivered to local users in the time unit] > > parameter of spool thread: > <spoolmanager> > <!-- Number of spool threads --> > <threads> 10 </threads> > > I will try the max db connection suggested by Stefano. > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2011/3/28 kushal soy <[email protected]>: >> > Hi >> > >> > >> > submision is much faster from client machine; but irrespective of >> > submission rate server is always processing at almost same rate(1-2 >> > msg/second). >> > so spool size just growing with time. >> >> main spool or outgoing spool? >> >> > I also increased the spool thread size to 20 from 10(default); but it >> > reduced the overall performance. >> >> please define how you measure "performance". Number of mail delivered >> to local users in the time unit? Number of mail delivered to remote >> users in the time unit? Number of mail processed by some custom mailet >> you developed? >> >> > my max db connection is 20. >> >> If you have 20 spoolthread you should use more than 20 db connections. >> >> Try using a max db pool size = spoolthreads + outgoing threads (remote >> delivery) + max-connections (tcp connections) >> They all need db connections to do their job. >> >> Stefano >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
