Re: James App Assembly [WAS Re: Factor Out James Application Assembly ...?]

Wed, 06 Jul 2011 01:44:30 -0700 

Hi Eric,

what are you refering to ?

Bye,
Norman

Am 06.07.2011 10:25, schrieb Eric Charles:

Hi Robert,
Just for information (don't know if it's relevant to us), the following thread where Edward seems to have fun :) 

Read Dan's points 1 and 2.

Thx.

On 03/07/11 21:32, Norman Maurer wrote:

I think we should release them as 3.0.0 beta also, as I really would
like to 'fix' the osgi stuff before call it 'final'

bye
norman

Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin
<[email protected]>:
&gt; On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Norman Maurer
&gt;&lt;[email protected]&gt; wrote:
&gt;&gt; hi there,
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; I will update the source to work with mailbox 0.3 and start a VOTE for 
&gt;&gt; the artifacts. So stay tuned...
&gt;
&gt; IMO it's best to release the server components as 3.0.0 and then
&gt; apache-james as a beta
&gt;
&gt; Robert
&gt;
&gt; --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
&gt; To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
&gt; For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
&gt;
&gt;

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]







---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to